Basic Catholic Fundamentals of Faith (Fundamentales de la Fe Católica):
PASTORAL COMMENTS REGARDING CONDOMS, THE POPE'S REMARKS AND THE PRESS'S INTERPRETATION
SEX, AIDS, CONDOMS
The secular press twists the words of the Holy Father in order to promote unchaste sexual activity outside of marriage betweeen a man and a women. Still, sexual intimacies are proper only to a man and woman united in holy matrimony. Other sexual activity falls under the mortal sin of lust in the following ways.
Fornication refers to sexual intimacies between two unmarried persons
Adultery refers to sexual intimacies where at least one person is married
Masturbation refers to sexual self pleasure
Prostitution refers to the selling or buying of sexual intimacies
Rape refers to forced sexual intimacies
Pornography refers to simulated sexual activity
Homosexuality refers to sexual intimacy between members of the same sex.
Artificial Contraception among married couples including condoms.
The use of condoms to prevent pregnancy in a married relationship undermine the character of marriage and the three fold gift of permanence, fidelity, and openness to children. It violates the other, using the other for mere gratification.
Sexual activity is NEVER proper to anyone who is not in a sacramental marriage between man and woman.
For those who are so wounded psychologically, ethically, morally as to disregard this admonition and whose will is so weakened or mind so darkened that they cannot or will not control their sexual urges, condoms can prevent disease transmission, but NEVER justify the sexual intimacies. Such people use sexual intimacy to try unsuccessfully to satisfy an unmet developmental need, to seek affirmation, attention, or affection, as a psychological repair process for traumatic events among other reasons.
These never work, and degrade everyone involved in the sexual act.
Jesuit Fr. Lombardi, the papal spokesman gives a clarification below.
STATEMENT ON PONTIFF’S WORDS
“The Pope Does Not Reform or Change the Church’s Teaching”
At the end of chapter 10 of the book “Light of the World” the Pope responds to two questions about the battle against AIDS and the use of condoms, questions that reconnect with the discussion that followed some statements that the Pope made on the theme during the course of his trip to Africa in 2009.
The Pope again clearly stresses that at that time he had not intended to take a position on the problem of condoms in general, but wanted to affirm with force that the problem of AIDS cannot be solved simply by distributing condoms, because much more needs to be done: prevention, education, help, counsel, being with people both to keep them from getting sick and in the case that they do get sick.
The Pope observes that even in the non-ecclesial context an analogous awareness has developed, as is apparent in the so-called ABC theory (Abstinence -- Be Faithful -- Condom), in which the first two elements (abstinence and fidelity) are more decisive and basic in the battle against AIDS, while condoms appear in the last place as a way out, when the other two are not there. It should thus be clear that condoms are not the solution to the problem.
The Pope then broadens the perspective and insists on the fact that focusing only on condoms is equivalent to banalizing sexuality, which loses its meaning as an expression of love between persons and becomes a “drug.” Fighting against banalization of sexuality is “part of the great effort to help sexuality be valued positively and have a positive effect on man in his totality.”
In the light of this broad and profound vision of human sexuality and the contemporary discussion of it, the Pope reaffirms that “naturally the Church does not consider condoms as the authentic and moral solution” to the problem of AIDS.
In this the Pope does not reform or change the Church’s teaching, but reaffirms it, placing it in the perspective of the value and dignity of human sexuality as an expression of responsible love.
At the same time the Pope considers an exceptional circumstance in which the exercise of sexuality represents a real threat for the life of another. In that case, the Pope does not morally justify the disordered exercise of sexuality but maintains that the use of a condom to reduce the danger of infection may be “a first act of responsibility,” “a first step on the road toward a more human sexuality,” rather than not using it and exposing the other to risking his life.
In this, the reasoning of the Pope certainly cannot be defined as a revolutionary change. Numerous moral theologians and authoritative ecclesiastical figures have supported and support analogous positions; it is nevertheless true that we have not heard this with such clarity from the mouth of the Pope, even if it is in a informal and not magisterial form.
With courage Benedict XVI thus offers us an important contribution of clarification and reflection on a question that has long been debated. It is an original contribution, because on one hand it maintains fidelity to moral principles and demonstrates lucidity in refuting an illusory path like that of the “confidence is condoms”; on the other hand, however, it manifests a comprehensive and far-seeing vision, attentive to uncovering the small steps -- even if only initial and still confused -- of an often spiritually and culturally impoverished humanity, toward a more human and responsible exercise of sexuality.